It is like you (aggressive approach ) and me (non voilent approach) are in a jeep (India) full of passengers and love the jeep and co passengers more than our lives and soles. We can compromise every thing but the safety of Jeep. Jeep is moving on. Here lies the problem. Suddenly we got two ways to go. Confusion!. You think most porbab right one is safe (the most simple one and seems to be a shortcut). But based on my readings and learnings so far I think such roades are not safe. Moreover I m sure about left as it worked out in somewhat similar situation in South Africa. We will ( and sud) go against each other no matter how much we love each other ( we love the jeep more!). Now tell me are we both not correct? Are both of us not doing right thing?
Now a days ppl talk about practicality then tell me who is more practical in this case study? One whose approach was proven or one who wanted to win enemy with a weapon (voilence) enemy is more profound in using!! He excercised this weapon successfully in 1/3 part of this planet!
